Illustrative mockup — placeholder data for design demonstration. Not actual study findings.
RWB Impact Studypolicy command center
EvidenceHighModerateIndicativeInsufficient
Compare(0/4)
Pin states or waterbodies from any module — side-by-side comparison follows you.
Module 13 · Export mode
RWB Impact Study · Executive Brief

National overview

Auto-assembled from current selection · Phase 1 + Phase 2
Illustrative mockup
Not actual study findings

Headline findings

  1. Water availability rose most in basaltic Maharashtra (illustrative Δ +34 pp vs comparison). High
  2. Silt-application uptake tracked composite score across states — signal, not attribution. Moderate
  3. TMC women’s representation crosses 50% at ~42% of sampled sites; concentrated in P1. Moderate
  4. Per-waterbody cost ranges 6–32 ₹ lakh with no simple cost-outcome monotone. Indicative
  5. Convergence with Amrit Sarovar is present in ~1/3 of sites, mostly partial. Indicative

Comparison chart

Composite score · illustrative

Map thumbnail

RJ
MP
MH
UP

What this means for scale-up

Under illustrative conditions, replicability is highest where institutional readiness (Panchayat + NGO + PMU) exceeds ~60 and geohydrology supports recharge. Priority states in the current selection (RJ, MP, MH, UP) would benefit most from convergence sequencing with Amrit Sarovar and MGNREGA before further capital works.

Prepared by the RWB study team · Aline Partners (mockup)Illustrative — not for citation